How to use this checklist
A glazing scope goes sideways when a decision gets made out of order — glass is selected before the wind pressure is known, a frame system is locked before the building height is confirmed, or a submittal goes out missing the product approval that the building official will ask for first. This checklist follows the order our team works in so the upstream answers are settled before the downstream ones depend on them.
It is written for Florida work, where the Florida Building Code and the High-Velocity Hurricane Zone provisions drive most of the early decisions. Items reference real code sections, ASTM test standards, and product-approval mechanisms so you can verify them against your project documents. Treat it as a starting point, not a substitute for the architect of record, the engineer of record, or the building official with jurisdiction over your site.
-
01
Project Discovery
Scope, location, building type, occupancy — the inputs every later decision depends on.Why this matters
Everything downstream — wind pressure, impact rating, glass make-up, frame depth, anchor design — is calculated from location, height, and occupancy. Get the Risk Category wrong and the engineer designs to the wrong load; get the scope boundary wrong and two trades both leave out the perimeter sealant. Settling these first is the cheapest insurance on the whole package.
-
02
Wind + Impact Requirements
HVHZ vs. non-HVHZ, design pressure, product approval, and the FBC compliance path.Why this matters
This is where Florida glazing is won or lost. A building official will not approve a glazing submittal without product approval documentation that matches the calculated design pressure and the as-installed configuration. Specifying a system without a valid FL approval or NOA — or one rated below the opening's actual load — is the most common reason a glazing submittal gets rejected and the schedule slips. The HVHZ path is stricter still, and Miami-Dade and Broward will hold the line on it.
-
03
Glass Performance Specs
Laminated, tempered, low-E, solar heat gain, U-factor, and acoustic targets.Why this matters
Glass make-up has to satisfy three masters at once: structural and impact performance, energy code, and the architect's appearance. A spec that calls for impact resistance but a thin PVB interlayer will not pass; one that hits the look but ignores SHGC will fail the energy review. Pinning the interlayer, coating, SHGC, U-factor, and acoustic target up front keeps the IGU order from being re-cut later.
-
04
Frame System Selection
Storefront vs. curtain wall vs. window wall — matched to height and structure.Why this matters
Storefront, curtain wall, and window wall are not interchangeable — they attach to the structure differently and carry load differently. Specifying storefront framing on a span that calls for curtain wall, or vice versa, leads to a value-engineering scramble after award. Knowing the building height and the design pressure first (Sections 01 and 02) makes this selection straightforward.
-
05
Hardware + Operability
Door hardware, panic devices, automatic operators, and ADA operating force.Why this matters
Hardware is where glazing, electrical, security, and accessibility all meet, and it is the part of the scope most often left vague until it is too late to coordinate. An entrance that misses panic hardware on an egress door, or exceeds the ADA opening force, will not pass inspection. Specifying the full set — including the electrified and automatic pieces — up front keeps the trades from finger-pointing at close-out.
-
06
Fire-Rated Requirements
UL listings, time ratings, fire-protective vs. fire-resistive, and listed products.Why this matters
Fire-rated glazing is a life-safety system and the building official treats it that way. The most common error is mixing fire-protective glazing into an opening that the code requires to be fire-resistive, or pairing rated glass with an unrated frame. Because the glass and frame are listed as one tested assembly, the listing has to match the exact opening — a missing or mismatched label fails inspection and holds the certificate of occupancy.
-
07
Submittal Package
Shop drawings, structural calcs, product approvals, manufacturer data, and samples.Why this matters
A complete submittal package is the difference between one review cycle and three. The two pieces most often missing are sealed structural calculations and product-approval documents that actually match the openings — and those are exactly the two the reviewer checks first. Assembling the full package up front protects the fabrication-release date, which protects the whole schedule.
-
08
Schedule + Close-Out
Lead times, install sequence, punch, and the warranty and close-out documents.Why this matters
Glazing lead time is the quiet schedule killer. Because fabrication does not start until submittals are approved, a slow submittal cycle (Section 07) pushes delivery weeks to the right and lands glazing on the critical path behind building dry-in. Pinning lead times in writing, sequencing the install, and lining up the close-out documents keeps the scope from being the reason the certificate of occupancy waits.
This checklist is general guidance for Florida commercial glazing, current as of 2026. Code editions, product approvals, and manufacturer lead times change. Always verify the current Florida Building Code edition, the live Florida Product Approval or Miami-Dade NOA, and confirmed lead times against your specific project, and defer to the architect of record, engineer of record, and the building official with jurisdiction.
Want a glazing partner that meets every item on this checklist?
Use this checklist as a starting point. If you want a glazing partner that meets every item on it — product approvals that match the openings, sealed calcs, a clean submittal package, and lead times confirmed in writing — talk to ACG, Florida's commercial glazing standard. Send us the plans and specs and we will run this same sequence on your project.
Send Us Plans